Now
that football is over and we are less than a month from the Big Ten Tournament,
it appears to be time for my annual attempt at predicting the Big Ten
Tournament seeds, based on every team's remaining schedule, and each Big Ten
team's chances of making the NCAA Tournament.
My
beloved Hoosiers have fallen quite precipitously since the beginning of the year. At one time, they were ranked #3 and looked
poised to defend their outright Big Ten crown.
Now, they are looking like they won't even make the NCAA Tournament. Injuries to Collin Hartman (for the season), OG
Anunoby (for the season, after January 18), and James Blackmon (for a couple
games) haven't helped, but that's no excuse for losing five out of six games
(and it's not like they were lighting it up before OG went down). It hurts to be an IU fan right now.
Before
we get to this year's predictions, let's take a look at how my
initial Big Ten Tournament seeding predictions last year compared to how
things actually shook out. For each
seed, my initial prediction is the first team listed, with the predicted record
in parentheses, and the second team is the team that actually ended up with
that seed, with their actual record in parentheses.
1. Iowa (15-3); Indiana (15-3)
2. Indiana (14-4); Michigan State (13-5)
3. Maryland (14-4); Maryland (12-6)
4. Michigan State (13-5); Purdue (12-6)
5. Purdue (12-6); Iowa (12-6)
6. Michigan (11-7); Wisconsin (12-6)
7. Wisconsin (10-8); Ohio State (11-7)
8. Ohio State (10-8); Michigan (10-8)
9. Northwestern (7-11); Northwestern (8-10)
10. Nebraska (7-11); Penn State (7-11)
11. Illinois (5-13); Nebraska (6-12)
12. Penn State (4-14); Illinois (5-13)
13. Rutgers (2-16); Minnesota (2-16)
14. Minnesota (1-17); Rutgers (1-17)
Wow. 2 out of 14.
I didn't think I could do worse than the 3 out of 14 I correctly
predicted two years ago. With how
unpredictable the Big Ten (and college basketball in general) has been this
year, I'm not holding out any hope for my predictions improving in their
accuracy this year.
The
whole Big Ten has been up and down so far this season. Right now, Maryland, Northwestern, and
Wisconsin have been the pleasant surprises of the Big Ten, and the Wildcats
look poised to make their first ever NCAA Tournament. Purdue has played up to expectations, while Indiana,
Michigan State, and Iowa have disappointed.
Granted, IU and MSU have both had to deal with some significant injuries
to impact players, but that is no excuse for a 15-11 and 15-10 record,
respectively. Other than Rutgers, the
rest of the league has been okay, if not entirely inconsistent. However, I'd say that the "bottom"
of the league is much better this year than it has been the past few
years. No one is safe.
Next games
The
next games take place tomorrow night (all times Eastern):
-Rutgers
at Purdue (7:00 p.m.; BTN)
-Ohio
State at Michigan State (9:00 p.m.; ESPN)
-Penn
State at Nebraska (9:00 p.m.; BTN)
Current
Standings
Here
are the current standings, with the conference record, each team's remaining
Big Ten games, and my predictions. I
will try to update these after every day or every couple days of games.
1. Wisconsin (10-2): at Michigan (W); Maryland (W); at Ohio State
(W); at Michigan State (W); Iowa (W); Minnesota (W)
2 (tie). Maryland (9-3): at Northwestern (W); at Wisconsin (L);
Minnesota (W); Iowa (W); at Rutgers (W); Michigan State (W)
2 (tie). Purdue (9-3): Rutgers (W); Michigan State (W); at Penn
State (W); at Michigan (W); Indiana (W); at Northwestern (L)
4. Northwestern (8-4): Maryland (L); Rutgers (W); at Illinois (W);
at Indiana (L); Michigan (W); Purdue (W)
5. Michigan State (7-5): Ohio State (W); at Purdue (L); Nebraska (W);
Wisconsin (L); at Illinois (W); at Maryland (L)
6 (tie). Minnesota (6-6): Indiana (W); Michigan (W); at Maryland (L);
Penn State (W); Nebraska (W); at Wisconsin (L)
6 (tie). Michigan (6-6): Wisconsin (L); at Minnesota (L); at Rutgers
(W); Purdue (L); at Northwestern (L); at Nebraska (L)
8 (tie). Iowa (6-7): Illinois (W); Indiana (L); at Maryland (L);
at Wisconsin (L); Penn State (W)
8 (tie). Penn State (6-7): at Nebraska (L); Purdue (L); at Minnesota (L);
Ohio State (W); at Iowa (L)
10 (tie). Indiana (5-8): at Minnesota (L); at Iowa (W); Northwestern
(W); at Purdue (L); at Ohio State (W)
10 (tie). Ohio State (5-8): at Michigan State (L); Nebraska (W);
Wisconsin (L); at Penn State (L); Indiana (L)
12. Nebraska (4-8): Penn State (W); at Ohio State (L); at Michigan
State (L); Illinois (W); at Minnesota (L); Michigan (W)
13. Illinois (4-9): at Iowa (L); Northwestern (L); at Nebraska (L);
Michigan State (L); at Rutgers (L)
14. Rutgers (2-11): at Purdue (L); at Northwestern (L); Michigan
(L); Maryland (L); Illinois (W)
Projected Big
Ten Tournament Seeding
Given
my predictions and Big Ten
tiebreaking rules, here is how the Big Ten Tournament seeds should fall
into place (bold means a team has clinched that seed):
1. Wisconsin (16-2)
2. Purdue (14-4) (has
tiebreaker over Maryland based on 1-0 head-to-head record)
3. Maryland (14-4)
4. Northwestern (12-6)
5. Michigan State (10-8) (has
tiebreaker over Minnesota based on 2-0 head-to-head record)
6. Minnesota (10-8)
7. Indiana (8-10) (would have
tiebreaker over Iowa based on 1-0 head-to-head record)
8. Iowa (8-10)
9. Nebraska (7-11) (Michigan and
Nebraska both would have 2-1 records against the other two teams, while PSU
would have an 0-2 record. Nebraska would
have the tiebreaker over Michigan based on better record vs. Purdue)
10. Michigan (7-11)
11. Penn State (7-11)
12. Ohio State (6-12)
13. Illinois (4-14)
14. Rutgers (3-15)
Big Ten
Tournament Schedule
In
the past, I have also included far-too-premature predictions for every game of
the Big Ten Tournament, but, like the last couple years, I'm not even going to
try to do that this year until the seeds are more finalized. However, here are the dates/times/TV schedule
for the Big Ten Tournament (and a link to the bracket), which will be in Washington,
DC. All times are Eastern.
Wednesday
March 8 – First Round
(12)
vs. (13) (4:30 p.m. ESPN2)
(11)
vs. (14) (7 p.m. BTN)
Thursday
March 9 – Second Round
(8)
vs. (9) (Noon, BTN)
(5)
vs. (12)/(13) (2:30 p.m., BTN)
(7)
vs. (10) (6:30 p.m., ESPN2)
(6)
vs. (11)/(14) (9 p.m., ESPN2)
Friday
March 10 – Quarterfinals
(1)
vs. (8)/(9) (Noon, ESPN)
(4)
vs. (5)/(12)/(13) (2:30 p.m., ESPN)
(2)
vs. (7)/(10) (6:30 p.m., BTN)
(3)
vs. (6)/(11)/(14) (9 p.m., BTN)
Saturday
March 11 – Semifinals
(1)/(8)/(9)
vs. (4)/(5)/(12)/(13) (1 p.m., CBS)
(2)/(7)/(10)
vs. (3)/(6)/(11)/(14) (3:30 p.m., CBS)
Sunday
March 12 – Finals
(1)/(4)/(5)/(8)/(9)/(12)/(13)
vs. (2)/(3)/(6)/(7)/(10)/(11)/(14) (3 p.m., CBS)
NCAA
Tournament Resumes for All 14 Big Ten Teams
Here
is each Big Ten team's NCAA Tournament resume, including each team's RPI (based
on ESPN's daily RPI),
BPI (based on ESPN's
BPI rankings), overall record against D-1 opponents, "good" wins
(wins against RPI Top 50 teams or, if none, the team's best win),
"bad" losses (losses against teams with an RPI of 101+ or, if none,
the team's worst loss). An * means the
game was played on a neutral court, and for the "good" wins and
"bad" losses, the team's current RPI is identified. I have categorized the teams by
"In," "Bubble," or "Out," which is my best guess,
based on what I know right now, as to whether each team is a lock for the NCAA
Tournament, is on the bubble, or is out.
I have also added a record vs. the RPI Top 50 and Top 100. For the "In" and "Out"
teams, I'm putting them in order based on RPI ranking. For the "Bubble" teams, I am
putting them in order based on what I think their likelihood of making the NCAA
Tournament is (which may or may not fall in line with the RPI ranking).
In
1. Purdue
RPI: 18
BPI: 9
Overall
record: 20-5
Record
vs. RPI Top 50: 5-3
Record
vs. RPI Top 100: 10-4
Good
wins: 5 (at Maryland (23), Wisconsin
(24), Notre Dame* (25), Northwestern (34), at Michigan State (41))
Bad
losses: 1 (at Iowa (105))
2. Minnesota
RPI: 21
BPI: 44
Overall
record: 18-7
Record
vs. RPI Top 50: 4-5
Record
vs. RPI Top 100: 8-7
Good
wins: 4 (at Purdue (18), at Northwestern
(34), Arkansas (42), UT Arlington (48))
Bad
losses: None
3. Maryland
RPI: 23
BPI: 43
Overall
record: 20-4
Record
vs. RPI Top 50: 3-1
Record
vs. RPI Top 100: 12-4
Good
wins: 3 (at Minnesota (21), Oklahoma
State (28), Kansas State* (43))
Bad
losses: None
4. Wisconsin
RPI: 24
BPI: 15
Overall
record: 21-4
Record
vs. RPI Top 50: 2-4
Record
vs. RPI Top 100: 12-4
Good
wins: 2 (at Minnesota (21), Tennessee*
(44))
Bad
losses: None
5. Northwestern
RPI: 34
BPI: 38
Overall
record: 19-6
Record
vs. RPI Top 50: 3-5
Record
vs. RPI Top 100: 8-6
Good
wins: 3 (at Wisconsin (24), Dayton*
(30), Wake Forest (31))
Bad
losses: None
Bubble
6. Michigan State
RPI: 41
BPI: 49
Overall
record: 15-10
Record
vs. RPI Top 50: 3-5
Record
vs. RPI Top 100: 7-9
Good
wins: 3 (Minnesota (21), at Minnesota
(21), Northwestern (34))
Bad
losses: 1 (Northeastern (140))
7. Michigan
RPI: 61
BPI: 24
Overall
record: 16-9
Record
vs. RPI Top 50: 2-6
Record
vs. RPI Top 100: 9-8
Good
wins: 2 (SMU* (19), Michigan State (41))
Bad
losses: 1 (at Iowa (105))
8. Indiana
RPI: 87
BPI: 30
Overall
record: 15-11
Record
vs. RPI Top 50: 3-7
Record
vs. RPI Top 100: 6-10
Good
wins: 3 (Kansas* (3), North Carolina
(5), Michigan State (41))
Bad
losses: 1 (at Fort Wayne (167))
9. Ohio State
RPI: 59
BPI: 56
Overall
record: 15-11
Record
vs. RPI Top 50: 2-8
Record
vs. RPI Top 100: 6-9
Good
wins: 2 (Minnesota (21), Michigan State
(41))
Bad
losses: 2 (at Iowa (105), Florida
Atlantic (297))
Out
10. Penn State
RPI: 65
BPI: 87
Overall
record: 14-12
Record
vs. RPI Top 50: 3-5
Record
vs. RPI Top 100: 6-9
Good
wins: 3 (Minnesota (21), Maryland (23),
Michigan State* (41))
Bad
losses: 3 (George Mason (111), Rutgers
(146), Albany (157))
11. Illinois
RPI: 66
BPI: 72
Overall
record: 13-12
Record
vs. RPI Top 50: 2-7
Record
vs. RPI Top 100: 6-12
Good
wins: 2 (VCU* (27), at Northwestern (34))
Bad
losses: None
12. Nebraska
RPI: 83
BPI: 106
Overall
record: 9-14
Record
vs. RPI Top 50: 3-8
Record
vs. RPI Top 100: 4-11
Good
wins: 3 (Purdue (18), at Maryland (23),
Dayton* (30))
Bad
losses: 3 (at Iowa (105), at Rutgers
(146), Gardner-Webb (221))
13. Iowa
RPI: 105
BPI: 90
Overall
record: 14-12
Record
vs. RPI Top 50: 1-8
Record
vs. RPI Top 100: 5-10
Good
wins: 1 (Purdue (18))
Bad
losses: 2 (Memphis* (103), Omaha (182))
14. Rutgers
RPI: 146
BPI: 148
Overall
record: 12-13
Record
vs. RPI Top 50: 0-8
Record
vs. RPI Top 100: 2-11
Good
wins: None (at Penn State (65))
Bad
losses: 2 (Iowa (105), at Iowa (105))
No comments:
Post a Comment